What I think right now is unbearable, the constant evocation that may lie ahead of us disasters. I almost think they wanted to protect themselves than for all In the event that the disaster will indeed.
Since one can then say with a clear conscience, we warned you, it had to happen, it was inevitable. But I think it is permissible to ask, is it really wise continuously spread disaster scenarios? That can not be without effect on the population, thereby increasing the feeling more and more insecure. No one steals her the strength to change things? If you constantly pretend that these things are inevitable, why the individual should still work hard in their privacy?
This process of infectious scaremongering does not help us all. It only makes us insecure. Or it is believed that one could thereby an attitude like; now really, we can not reach intimidated?
What remains to the people of today? It is made clear to them indirectly, by the state that they no longer have to expect much because he is penniless! But wait times, the state, who is that? Are not we the state?
A state with high gross national product is not in a position to its citizens who have earned this product to let part of it? He may in the future do not expect too much. The best prepared he is when he is a relentless aging presents in poverty. Work there will be only for a few. The privileged. Why do people repeatedly try to convince people that one is really in a position jobs to create, where at least try on the other side with huge capital investments will increasingly rationalize?
And then constantly excuse that there were too few qualified workers. It also has no money to young people to enable them to acquire the skills they need to prevail in this society. And why these young people developed so little ambition? For no one understands the hopelessness of their situation, as for the future. If you believe really that young people have no feeling for it?
On the other hand, the policy aims to make it clear to us that it has no effect on the manipulation and speculation in the stock markets, because at the same time endangering the whole system? Because it has only to listen to any lobbyists.
Are we governed by politicians or by the capital market? Is our democracy just a sham entity? Politicians always talk out so that they can not take any financial market policy measures, if not all do. When will a politician has the guts to make a beginning? I am sure that is a good example to find imitators. But the courage to be good politicians long ago lost
has come.
I can only say one thing: help, who will save democracy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment