How To To Put Stay Free

election banter

Politicians take the opportunity to resolve difficult situations with great speeches and make promises at the same time impossible, for the dishonor they will be held to account extremely rare.


election banter


Since there are so many definitions and explanations of the term "policy" is still, I have no other choice than to seek its own definition and come to the conclusion that: The policy

help the democratically elected parties with the use of them by the voters given the state of power to the risks from the outside and inside to protect. They should make the internal justice of the social structures, and will bring peace and make sure that none of its citizens suffer degrading lives, and must lead. The state should use every available means to the general welfare of its citizens to preserve and promote. The State should limit the freedom of development, if it goes at the expense of others.

is currently campaigning. In such times, very much like the word "peace" in the mouth taken while people talk of "campaign" is. And something else, it is not good. I see only how the parties try to cut each other in the pan, put their opponent's candidate in a bad light.
It promises are made, the same empty words and often irresponsible, because they most likely are not feasible. By
other subject to the dishonest handling of taxpayers' money, will be out to their own integrity, then again at the end of the other party be caught in another financial questionable to. It is also interesting that one explains the other party to the opponent. In the end, all declare themselves to the enemy and I wonder as a voter, how to come out in opposition to such a good thing for the state. One can not have only the key of this statement. Or should they all be right?
what the parties really want and what they can be really, I do not know. Everyone wants to get my health in a different way and that confused me, of course. Everyone claims to have in the bag by itself the key of wisdom. When one is mistaken, then it is definitely the others. And if that'd be choice, include only the majority and at the end are those who have the "only truth" represented forced to team up with those that they themselves previously described as incompetent. Thus the wisdom combined with stupidity and the result is mediocrity. This is probably the only form of government we deserve: mediocrity.
A government whose powers are bound by mediocrity. Where is the politician of his goals, the correctness of his business is so very convinced that he dares to fail?
protects against one thing only: mediocrity. Since one has to be elected the greatest guarantee again.
As if the only objective is to get elected?

Where Buy Enema, Toronto

and now I

Some time ago I read in the book "Who am I" by Richard David Precht some philosophical reflections on the concept of self. For all the love for philosophy, I think such analysis very academic. It appealed to me but also my "mustard" to give this:


And now I: fight

As the psychologists and philosophers, physicians on the concept of "I".
I wonder, is it here to dogmatism, to science or to the absolute truth. Why do we have to do in our constant striving for profundity such considerations?
there can be no doubt when someone says I'm here, that we you know what he means. He, the person X. whose face is identical with what is scanned on the document of his passport, we know it or not, appears before us, we make a picture of him, his appearance remains in our memory, we remember his body to its size , of his attitude to the way he goes to his voice, his peculiarities, and if we see him again, we say, there he is. He, who introduced himself by saying I am here.
We now know about its identity. But of course that is only the outward form of his ICH. It's kind of an envelope, a book is assigned and, therefore, of course, always the same Appearance has. When we see it, we know that the book is so and so. But now a book has the great advantage that we can open it and read it and learn of its contents. However, the person who introduced himself to me by saying that I am, here I am to decide whether to let me read her book or not. You can also change your text constantly and I always represent different, that is to say, it is not so simple a person can recognize the content, meaning that it not be made where the identity is so simple. But especially if the person is completely different clothes, a different hairstyle At length, or even undergoes facial surgery. If they then shifted their vote and are suddenly very different beliefs and opinions of themselves, of course we will have difficulty here is the old I recognize that we once imagined. So the philosophers are right when they say that we have difficulty with the concept of the I?
I think we are at this point quite a bit advanced, for if the essence, that's to us once here with the phrase introduced I immediately remove the blood receives, we would be documented in the position its genetic code and thus could then we always see the old self.
As far as my observation about a person outside of my Body.
But it looks to my own I? I think that the questions can be answered easily, of course, up to an exceptional situation. That later. I recognize myself constantly through my own consciousness. When I wake up in the morning, I know who I am. I know that I am the same person who is in the morning before waking up too. And the day before and the day before, etc. When I look in the mirror every morning, I realize now that I see it there, I yesterday, and may the day before yesterday, etc., etc. I remember my past more or less facts and events and can arrange that may have sat through a total of only ICH. Until the date on which I by any unfortunate accident my memory was lost, but I am then I still, even if I do not know, my genetic code has remained the same. The ego is inseparable, it is composed of body and mind, which means that I play is not only in our brains but because the brain is supplied by the body is that I need a whole inseparable.
So far, so good, now I do only one term in the way, where I let the soul? It is hidden somewhere in the ME! I think they have been removed from the ME and that's not in my opinion correctly, the soul is body and mind in itself, it is nothing more than another expression for ICH. If I die, there is no more and I therefore no soul. The elements of my body dissolve and become one with the universe. Since then, my soul is!