Politicians take the opportunity to resolve difficult situations with great speeches and make promises at the same time impossible, for the dishonor they will be held to account extremely rare.
election banter
Since there are so many definitions and explanations of the term "policy" is still, I have no other choice than to seek its own definition and come to the conclusion that: The policy
help the democratically elected parties with the use of them by the voters given the state of power to the risks from the outside and inside to protect. They should make the internal justice of the social structures, and will bring peace and make sure that none of its citizens suffer degrading lives, and must lead. The state should use every available means to the general welfare of its citizens to preserve and promote. The State should limit the freedom of development, if it goes at the expense of others.
is currently campaigning. In such times, very much like the word "peace" in the mouth taken while people talk of "campaign" is. And something else, it is not good. I see only how the parties try to cut each other in the pan, put their opponent's candidate in a bad light.
It promises are made, the same empty words and often irresponsible, because they most likely are not feasible. By
other subject to the dishonest handling of taxpayers' money, will be out to their own integrity, then again at the end of the other party be caught in another financial questionable to. It is also interesting that one explains the other party to the opponent. In the end, all declare themselves to the enemy and I wonder as a voter, how to come out in opposition to such a good thing for the state. One can not have only the key of this statement. Or should they all be right?
what the parties really want and what they can be really, I do not know. Everyone wants to get my health in a different way and that confused me, of course. Everyone claims to have in the bag by itself the key of wisdom. When one is mistaken, then it is definitely the others. And if that'd be choice, include only the majority and at the end are those who have the "only truth" represented forced to team up with those that they themselves previously described as incompetent. Thus the wisdom combined with stupidity and the result is mediocrity. This is probably the only form of government we deserve: mediocrity.
A government whose powers are bound by mediocrity. Where is the politician of his goals, the correctness of his business is so very convinced that he dares to fail?
protects against one thing only: mediocrity. Since one has to be elected the greatest guarantee again.
As if the only objective is to get elected?
0 comments:
Post a Comment